Wikipedia blocks all sceptics

“If you are wondering what the heck is going on at Climatic Research Unit e-mail controversy article, I think I can provide a quick summary for everyone who’s not familiar with the situation. Basically, we have three groups of editors there. One group wants to maximize the damage of this controversy as much as possible. The second group wants to minimize it as much as possible. The third group just wants to write a good article in accordance with policies and guidelines on neutrality and reliability. We’ve been able to deal with the first group though various forms of blocking. However, we have not be able to address the issue of the second group. Thus far, repeated reminders about policy (particularly neutrality and undue weight) have not worked. The issue was brought up at NPOV Noticeboard, and an uninvolved editor has agreed that the article does not follow our neutrality policy. You can read the uninvolved editor’s opinion here. However, the ‘minimizer’ WP:CABAL of editors are still refusing to write the article in accordance with our neutrality policy.

“We’ve been able to deal with the first group though various forms of blocking.”

You don’t find that a bit problematical? Solicitr (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)” “User:A Quest For Knowledge” h/t Magicjava

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: